Atheists take the process as naturalistic, but one whose mechanisms we don’t currently and may never understand.
My understanding is that Ahmadi Muslims would not deny the jump from inorganic to organic matter, but that where the atheist would suggest an as-not-yet-known naturalistic explanation, the Ahmadi Muslim would suggest that the seeming statistically improbable arrangement of matter to trigger abiogenesis was caused by a Conscious Creator.
My understanding of Ahmadiyyat and the supernatural is written up on my post on Ahmadiyyat.
My understanding is that Ahmadi Muslims support naturalistic explanations for everything in the universe from the point of the Big Bang onwards.
Nature and probability itself were encoded and nudged by this Creator to produce the outcomes which many view as rare, spectacular, etc. based on our current knowledge.
Thus, if science as a tool ever discovers and explains the process of abiogenesis (material creating something non-material, as you put it), Ahmadi Muslims would say, “This doesn’t invalidate our religion. The mechanisms that science has discovered are how God allowed life to begin without violating his own laws of nature”.
Humanity’s inability to explain it at the present moment (our ignorance, lack of knowledge) doesn’t invalidate that there is some explanation that fits into the natural world. In philosophy, when we claim something cannot be because we don’t have a concrete explanation, that is known as the argument from ignorance.
Note: The logical fallacy of an argument from ignorance does not mean that the advocate of the argument is ignorant, it is speaking about using as an argument, the fact that our collective human knowledge doesn’t currently have an explanation. We know from the shrinking ‘God of the Gaps’ theories in history, that such positions encompass faulty logical reasoning.
If you have a blog or tweet-longer type mechanism, it may be easier to communicate these longer-form ideas. Peace.